The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Parse

Comparing MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Microsoft · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
8,192

Individual benchmarks

2 reported for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

135.7B diff

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has 135.7B more parameters than Parse, making it 5900.0% larger.

Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
138.0Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
138.0B
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens.

Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parse support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 1 month newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

3 weeks ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is available from GitHub Copilot. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

github-copilot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Parse.

Which is better, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Parse?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash (Microsoft) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MAI-Code-1.1-Flash compare to Parse in benchmarks?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parse?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parse?

Key differences include context window (256K vs 8K). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Parse?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft and Parse is developed by Cohere.