The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 28.3.

Google · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 28.3, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.4
#46
28.3
#126
Coding
35.6
#25
19.1
#102
Agents
31.2
#27
10.4
#107
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 2 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MAI-Code-1.1-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MAI-Code-1.1-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 1 month newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 days ago

3w newer
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

3 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 28.3. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to MAI-Code-1.1-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs 28.3), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons