The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 6.6.

Thinking Machines Lab · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Inkling 2 Small leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 6.6, ranking #41 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Inkling 2 Small wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Inkling 2 Small

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.1 and ranks #41 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
47.1
#41
6.6
#333
47.8
#26
2.6
#344
33.3
#39
-3.4
#222
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Inkling 2 Small
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
29.2#47
4.5#188
28.9#44
6.5#157
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Inkling 2 Small · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

1 shared

Inkling 2 Small outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Inkling 2 Small significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

585.7B diff

Inkling 2 Small has 585.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct, making it 7065.3% larger.

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
594.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
594.0B
Inkling 2 Small
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Inkling 2 Small specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

Thinking Machines Lab
Inkling 2 Small
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Nov 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Inkling 2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Inkling 2 Small

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Inkling 2 Small is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Inkling 2 Small

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Inkling 2 Small was released on 2026-11-05, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Inkling 2 Small is 22 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Inkling 2 Small

Nov 5, 2026

4 days ago

1.8yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Inkling 2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Inkling 2 Small
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Inkling 2 Small vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Inkling 2 Small or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Inkling 2 Small leads the LLM Stats Score 47.1 to 6.6. Inkling 2 Small is made by Thinking Machines Lab and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Inkling 2 Small compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Inkling 2 Small scores GPQA: 93.0%, BrowseComp: 90.2%, CharXiv-R: 85.6%, MCP Atlas: 85.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 82.2%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Inkling 2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Inkling 2 Small supports 256K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Inkling 2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.1 vs 6.6), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Inkling 2 Small and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Inkling 2 Small is developed by Thinking Machines Lab and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.