The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs LFM3-VL-2B

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.5 to 15.5.

LG AI Research · Liquid AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 25.5 to 15.5, ranking #186 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 25.5 and ranks #186 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
LG AI Research
LFM3-VL-2B
Liquid AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.5
#186
15.5
#265
Reasoning
26.6
#174
16.2
#252
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
32,768
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
LFM3-VL-2B
Math
28.0#107
19.0#187
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B · 41 for LFM3-VL-2B

No common benchmarks found

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and LFM3-VL-2Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

234.1B diff

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has 234.1B more parameters than LFM3-VL-2B, making it 12191.7% larger.

LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
236.0Bparameters
Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
1.9Bparameters
236.0B
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
1.9B
LFM3-VL-2B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only K-EXAONE-236B-A23B specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only K-EXAONE-236B-A23B specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

LG AI Research
K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

LFM3-VL-2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas K-EXAONE-236B-A23B does not.

LFM3-VL-2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is licensed under a proprietary license, while LFM3-VL-2B uses LFM Open License v1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Proprietary

Closed source

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B was released on 2025-12-31, while LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27.

LFM3-VL-2B is 10 months newer than K-EXAONE-236B-A23B.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Dec 31, 2025

10 months ago

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-10-01, while LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm K-EXAONE-236B-A23B's training data extends to 2025-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B

Oct 2025

LFM3-VL-2B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and LFM3-VL-2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B
✓ Preferred
LFM3-VL-2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about K-EXAONE-236B-A23B vs LFM3-VL-2B.

Which is better, K-EXAONE-236B-A23B or LFM3-VL-2B?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.5 to 15.5. K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is made by LG AI Research and LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does K-EXAONE-236B-A23B compare to LFM3-VL-2B in benchmarks?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B scores AIME 2025: 92.8%, MMMLU: 85.7%, MMLU-Pro: 83.8%, LiveCodeBench v6: 80.7%, t2-bench: 73.2%. LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%.

What are the context window sizes for K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and LFM3-VL-2B?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B supports 33K tokens and LFM3-VL-2B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and LFM3-VL-2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.5 vs 15.5), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs LFM Open License v1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes K-EXAONE-236B-A23B and LFM3-VL-2B?

K-EXAONE-236B-A23B is developed by LG AI Research and LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI.

Related comparisons