The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

K2 Horizon 0.9B vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 10.1 to 0.5.

Institute of Foundation Models · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 10.1 to 0.5, ranking #297 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose K2 Horizon 0.9B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 10.1 and ranks #297 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
0.5
#358
10.1
#297
0.6
#350
7.7
#313
-5.3
#218
2.0
#200
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
K2 Horizon 0.9B
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
3.3#308
7.8#282
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for K2 Horizon 0.9B · 45 for Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

2 shared

K2 Horizon 0.9B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench v6).

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

3.1B diff

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct has 3.1B more parameters than K2 Horizon 0.9B, making it 344.4% larger.

Institute of Foundation Models
K2 Horizon 0.9B
900,000,000parameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
4.0Bparameters
0.9B
K2 Horizon 0.9B
4.0B
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Institute of Foundation Models
K2 Horizon 0.9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas K2 Horizon 0.9B does not.

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

K2 Horizon 0.9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

K2 Horizon 0.9B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

K2 Horizon 0.9B was released on 2026-09-03, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

K2 Horizon 0.9B is 12 months newer than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.

K2 Horizon 0.9B

Sep 3, 2026

1 months ago

11mo newer
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against K2 Horizon 0.9B and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

K2 Horizon 0.9B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about K2 Horizon 0.9B vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.

Which is better, K2 Horizon 0.9B or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 10.1 to 0.5. K2 Horizon 0.9B is made by Institute of Foundation Models and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does K2 Horizon 0.9B compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct in benchmarks?

K2 Horizon 0.9B scores HumanEval+: 79.9%, MBPP+: 68.0%, AIME 2026: 48.5%, AIME 2025: 41.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 37.4%. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 94.0%, OCRBench: 88.1%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.1%, AI2D: 84.1%.

What are the context window sizes for K2 Horizon 0.9B and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

K2 Horizon 0.9B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between K2 Horizon 0.9B and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (0.5 vs 10.1), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes K2 Horizon 0.9B and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

K2 Horizon 0.9B is developed by Institute of Foundation Models and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.