The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Comparing Kimi K2.8 Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Moonshot AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Kimi K2.8 Preview also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.8 Preview

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Kimi K2.8 Preview · 9 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K2.8 Preview accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Only Llama 3.3 70B Instruct specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not.

Kimi K2.8 Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.8 Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.8 Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct was released on 2024-12-06.

Kimi K2.8 Preview is 21 months newer than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Sep 11, 2026

3 days ago

1.8yr newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Dec 6, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K2.8 Preview is available from Moonshot AI. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Hyperbolic, Groq, Sambanova, Cerebras, Bedrock, Together, Fireworks.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.32/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.59/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.90/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
cerebras logo
Cerebras
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.72/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.72/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.88/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2.8 Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2.8 Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Which is better, Kimi K2.8 Preview or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Kimi K2.8 Preview (Moonshot AI) and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Kimi K2.8 Preview compare to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores IFEval: 92.1%, MGSM: 91.1%, HumanEval: 88.4%, MBPP EvalPlus: 87.6%, MMLU: 86.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2.8 Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2.8 Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 131K), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2.8 Preview and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Kimi K2.8 Preview is developed by Moonshot AI and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is developed by Meta.