The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Phi 4 Mini

Comparing Kimi K2.8 Preview and Phi 4 Mini across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Moonshot AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Phi 4 Mini trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K2.8 Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Phi 4 Mini

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for Kimi K2.8 Preview · 17 for Phi 4 Mini

No common benchmarks found

Kimi K2.8 Preview and Phi 4 Minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K2.8 Preview specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.8 Preview
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini does not.

Kimi K2.8 Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Kimi K2.8 Preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K2.8 Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

Kimi K2.8 Preview is 20 months newer than Phi 4 Mini.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Kimi K2.8 Preview's cutoff date.

Kimi K2.8 Preview

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K2.8 Preview and Phi 4 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K2.8 Preview
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K2.8 Preview vs Phi 4 Mini.

Which is better, Kimi K2.8 Preview or Phi 4 Mini?

Kimi K2.8 Preview (Moonshot AI) and Phi 4 Mini (Microsoft) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Kimi K2.8 Preview compare to Phi 4 Mini in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K2.8 Preview and Phi 4 Mini?

Kimi K2.8 Preview supports 1.0M tokens and Phi 4 Mini supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K2.8 Preview and Phi 4 Mini?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K2.8 Preview and Phi 4 Mini?

Kimi K2.8 Preview is developed by Moonshot AI and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.