Kimi K3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Kimi K3 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 53.3 and 43.3 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 63.3x cheaper per token.
Moonshot AI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Kimi K3 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 53.3 and 43.3.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 63.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Kimi K3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Kimi K3
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- cost matters — it's about 63.3x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
31 reported for Kimi K3 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Kimi K3 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (APEX-Agents, SpreadsheetBench 2), while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is better at 0 benchmarks.
Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Kimi K3 ($2.85/1M tokens) is 47.5x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).
For output processing, Kimi K3 ($14.25/1M tokens) is 79.2x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Kimi K3 has 2676.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 2158.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Kimi K3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is limited to 262,144 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Kimi K3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.
Kimi K3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Kimi K3
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2 months newer than Kimi K3.
Jul 16, 2026
1 months ago
Sep 3, 2026
6 days ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Kimi K3 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Novita, Together. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.
Kimi K3
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Kimi K3 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Kimi K3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.