The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Wonder Full

Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched at 55.5 and 52.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Moonshot AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 55.5 and 52.2.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • you are already invested in the Meta ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.5
#5
52.2
#14
Reasoning
54.3
#6
40.4
#67
Coding
42.7
#9
42.5
#10
Agents
41.6
#5
41.0
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Muse Wonder Full
Vision
40.5#4
30.7#38
Tool use
30.4#14
24.4#46
Multimodal
40.8#2
30.9#35
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

30 reported for Kimi K3.1 Pro · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

3 shared

Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf), while Muse Wonder Full is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Marathon).

Kimi K3.1 Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K3.1 Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Kimi K3.1 Pro specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Kimi K3.1 Pro is 0 month newer than Muse Wonder Full.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Oct 23, 2026

4 days ago

1w newer
Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

2 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Muse Wonder Full?

Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 55.5 and 52.2. Kimi K3.1 Pro is made by Moonshot AI and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K3.1 Pro compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Kimi K3.1 Pro scores BabyVision: 95.4%, GPQA: 94.2%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 92.7%, BrowseComp: 92.1%, Chartography: 90.2%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full?

Kimi K3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder Full supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.5 vs 52.2), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K3.1 Pro and Muse Wonder Full?

Kimi K3.1 Pro is developed by Moonshot AI and Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons