Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 17.7. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 10.1x cheaper per token.
Moonshot AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 17.7, ranking #5 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is roughly 10.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Kimi K3.1 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- cost matters — it's about 10.1x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
30 reported for Kimi K3.1 Pro · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.
Kimi K3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 10.1x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Kimi K3.1 Pro is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Kimi K3.1 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's 131,072 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Kimi K3.1 Pro is 13 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
Oct 23, 2026
4 days ago
1.1yr newerSep 22, 2025
1.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.