LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 leads the LLM Stats Score 36.1 to 2.7.
Liquid AI · Inception · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Mercury 3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.1 to 2.7, ranking #98 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mercury 3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Mercury 3
- overall performance matters — it scores 36.1 and ranks #98 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
23 reported for LFM2.5-VL-3B · 12 for Mercury 3
LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mercury 3 is better at 1 benchmark (IFBench).
Mercury 3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Mercury 3 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Mercury 3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
LFM2.5-VL-3B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 3 does not.
LFM2.5-VL-3B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Mercury 3
License
Usage and distribution terms
LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Mercury 3 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
LFM Open License v1.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19.
Mercury 3 is 2 months newer than LFM2.5-VL-3B.
Aug 12, 2026
2 months ago
Oct 19, 2026
0 days ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mercury 3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Mercury 3.