The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 45.3 to 2.7.

Liquid AI · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.3 to 2.7, ranking #42 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you are already invested in the Liquid AI ecosystem

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.3 and ranks #42 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
Liquid AI
Muse Spark Open
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
2.7
#335
45.3
#42
Reasoning
-2.7
#356
45.7
#35
Agents
-5.2
#208
30.8
#43
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Muse Spark Open
Vision
1.1#196
31.3#33
Multimodal
2.9#162
33.1#20
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for LFM2.5-VL-3B · 17 for Muse Spark Open

1 shared

LFM2.5-VL-3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark Open is better at 1 benchmark (SimpleVQA).

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

812.9B diff

Muse Spark Open has 812.9B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 26024.7% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
816.0B
Muse Spark Open

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark Open specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark Open specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark Open support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.

Muse Spark Open is 2 months newer than LFM2.5-VL-3B.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

2 months ago

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark Open
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Muse Spark Open.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 45.3 to 2.7. LFM2.5-VL-3B is made by Liquid AI and Muse Spark Open is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to Muse Spark Open in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark Open?

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark Open?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.7 vs 45.3), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Muse Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and Muse Spark Open?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons