The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct

Comparing LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mistral NeMo Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Liquid AI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mistral NeMo Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM2.5-VL-3B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

Choose Mistral NeMo Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
Liquid AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Context window
—
128,000
Released
Aug 2026
Jul 2024
License
LFM Open License v1.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mistral NeMo Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

8.9B diff

Mistral NeMo Instruct has 8.9B more parameters than LFM2.5-VL-3B, making it 284.2% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
3.1Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
12.0Bparameters
3.1B
LFM2.5-VL-3B
12.0B
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral NeMo Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM2.5-VL-3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral NeMo Instruct does not.

LFM2.5-VL-3B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM2.5-VL-3B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM2.5-VL-3B was released on 2026-08-12, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

LFM2.5-VL-3B is 25 months newer than Mistral NeMo Instruct.

LFM2.5-VL-3B

Aug 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.1yr newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mistral NeMo Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM2.5-VL-3B
✓ Preferred
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM2.5-VL-3B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-3B or Mistral NeMo Instruct?

LFM2.5-VL-3B (Liquid AI) and Mistral NeMo Instruct (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does LFM2.5-VL-3B compare to Mistral NeMo Instruct in benchmarks?

LFM2.5-VL-3B scores DocVQA: 91.1%, POPE: 88.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 87.9%, TextVQA: 84.3%, OCRBench: 84.2%. Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

LFM2.5-VL-3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM2.5-VL-3B and Mistral NeMo Instruct?

LFM2.5-VL-3B is developed by Liquid AI and Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons