The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-VL-2B vs o1-pro

o1-pro leads the LLM Stats Score 19.1 to 15.5.

Liquid AI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1-pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 19.1 to 15.5, ranking #239 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose o1-pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 19.1 and ranks #239 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.5
#265
19.1
#239
16.2
#252
19.5
#228
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

41 reported for LFM3-VL-2B · 2 for o1-pro

No common benchmarks found

LFM3-VL-2B and o1-prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LFM3-VL-2B and o1-pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-VL-2B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while o1-pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

LFM3-VL-2B is 23 months newer than o1-pro.

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

5 days ago

1.9yr newer
o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date.

LFM3-VL-2B

—

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-VL-2B and o1-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-VL-2B
✓ Preferred
o1-pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-VL-2B vs o1-pro.

Which is better, LFM3-VL-2B or o1-pro?

o1-pro leads the LLM Stats Score 19.1 to 15.5. LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-VL-2B compare to o1-pro in benchmarks?

LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.

What are the main differences between LFM3-VL-2B and o1-pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.5 vs 19.1), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-VL-2B and o1-pro?

LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.