The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-VL-2B vs Phi 4

LFM3-VL-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.5 to 4.9.

Liquid AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM3-VL-2B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.5 to 4.9, ranking #265 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.5 and ranks #265 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Phi 4

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.5
#265
4.9
#336
16.2
#252
6.0
#326
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
—
16,384

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
LFM3-VL-2B
Phi 4
19.0#187
12.8#250
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

41 reported for LFM3-VL-2B · 13 for Phi 4

No common benchmarks found

LFM3-VL-2B and Phi 4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

12.8B diff

Phi 4 has 12.8B more parameters than LFM3-VL-2B, making it 665.6% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
1.9Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4
14.7Bparameters
1.9B
LFM3-VL-2B
14.7B
Phi 4

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi 4 specifies input context (16,384 tokens). Only Phi 4 specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,384 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Tue Nov 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

LFM3-VL-2B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 does not.

LFM3-VL-2B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-VL-2B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Phi 4 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.

LFM3-VL-2B is 23 months newer than Phi 4.

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

5 days ago

1.9yr newer
Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LFM3-VL-2B's cutoff date.

LFM3-VL-2B

—

Phi 4

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-VL-2B and Phi 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-VL-2B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-VL-2B vs Phi 4.

Which is better, LFM3-VL-2B or Phi 4?

LFM3-VL-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.5 to 4.9. LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI and Phi 4 is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-VL-2B compare to Phi 4 in benchmarks?

LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%. Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM3-VL-2B and Phi 4?

LFM3-VL-2B supports an unknown number of tokens and Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM3-VL-2B and Phi 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.5 vs 4.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-VL-2B and Phi 4?

LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI and Phi 4 is developed by Microsoft.