The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched at 15.5 and 12.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

Liquid AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.5 and 12.4.

In the 14 individual benchmarks reported for both models, LFM3-VL-2B wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 14 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM3-VL-2B
Liquid AI
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
15.5
#265
12.4
#287
Reasoning
16.2
#252
12.3
#281
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 14
6 of 14
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
LFM3-VL-2B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Math
19.0#187
6.9#287
Vision
11.4#133
9.1#158
Multimodal
12.6#124
11.8#130
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

41 reported for LFM3-VL-2B · 30 for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

14 shared

LFM3-VL-2B outperforms in 8 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, Hallusion Bench, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMStar, OCRBench-V2 (en), ScreenSpot Pro), while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (LVBench, MLVU-M, MMMU-Pro, MVBench, OCRBench, VideoMME w/o sub.).

LFM3-VL-2B has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Thu Nov 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

70.1B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has 70.1B more parameters than LFM3-VL-2B, making it 3650.0% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
1.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
1.9B
LFM3-VL-2B
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-VL-2B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

LFM3-VL-2B is 21 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.8yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-VL-2B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Which is better, LFM3-VL-2B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.5 and 12.4. LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-VL-2B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%.

What are the main differences between LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.5 vs 12.4), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons