The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B leads the LLM Stats Score 44.0 to 15.5.

Liquid AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-27B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.0 to 15.5, ranking #56 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-27B wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.0 and ranks #56 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.5
#265
44.0
#56
16.2
#252
43.6
#52
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
LFM3-VL-2B
Qwen3.8-27B
19.0#187
30.6#82
11.4#133
33.0#26
12.6#124
36.0#12
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

41 reported for LFM3-VL-2B · 26 for Qwen3.8-27B

4 shared

LFM3-VL-2B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 4 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, ERQA, MathVision, RealWorldQA).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

25.9B diff

Qwen3.8-27B has 25.9B more parameters than LFM3-VL-2B, making it 1346.9% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
1.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
1.9B
LFM3-VL-2B
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8-27B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.8-27B specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Nov 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-VL-2B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

LFM3-VL-2B is 2 months newer than Qwen3.8-27B.

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

5 days ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-VL-2B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, LFM3-VL-2B or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B leads the LLM Stats Score 44.0 to 15.5. LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-VL-2B compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen3.8-27B?

LFM3-VL-2B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8-27B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.5 vs 44.0), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen3.8-27B?

LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI and Qwen3.8-27B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.