Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs o3-pro
Comparing Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and o3-pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
InclusionAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and o3-pro trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 388.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- cost matters — it's about 388.9x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose o3-pro
- you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $80.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 0 for o3-pro
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and o3-prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens) is 333.3x cheaper than o3-pro ($20.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens) is 444.4x cheaper than o3-pro ($80.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, o3-pro is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to o3-pro's 200,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while o3-pro is limited to 100,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
o3-pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.
o3-pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
o3-pro
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while o3-pro was released on 2025-06-10.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 15 months newer than o3-pro.
Sep 3, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.2yr newerJun 10, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
o3-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm o3-pro's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.
—
May 2024
Provider Availability
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra. o3-pro is available from OpenAI.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
o3-pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and o3-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs o3-pro.