The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark 1.3 vs o3-pro

Comparing Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Meta · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-pro trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Muse Spark 1.3 is roughly 280.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • cost matters — it's about 280.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose o3-pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $80.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.10 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
$80.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
200,000

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Muse Spark 1.3 · 0 for o3-pro

No common benchmarks found

Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 costs less

For input processing, Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.10/1M tokens) is 200.0x cheaper than o3-pro ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Spark 1.3 ($0.20/1M tokens) is 400.0x cheaper than o3-pro ($80.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o3-pro is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerMeta
OpenAI
o3-pro
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$80.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to o3-pro's 200,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 can generate longer responses up to 943,718 tokens, while o3-pro is limited to 100,000 tokens.

Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
OpenAI
o3-pro
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

o3-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02, while o3-pro was released on 2025-06-10.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 15 months newer than o3-pro.

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer
o3-pro

Jun 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3-pro's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date.

Muse Spark 1.3

o3-pro

May 2024

Provider Availability

Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API. o3-pro is available from OpenAI.

Muse Spark 1.3

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

o3-pro

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $80.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.3
✓ Preferred
o3-pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.3 vs o3-pro.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.3 or o3-pro?

Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) and o3-pro (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Muse Spark 1.3 compare to o3-pro in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper than o3-pro?

Muse Spark 1.3 is 200.0x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via meta. o3-pro costs $20.00/M input and $80.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-pro?

Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens and o3-pro supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-pro?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 200K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.3 and o3-pro?

Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta and o3-pro is developed by OpenAI.