The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 13.1.

InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 13.1, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
13.1
#262
Reasoning
47.5
#26
13.2
#255
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 7 for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

510.1B diff

Ling 3.1 Flash has 510.1B more parameters than Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1, making it 1022.2% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
49.9Bparameters
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash
49.9B
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 was released on 2025-03-18.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 19 months newer than Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Mar 18, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.

Ling 3.1 Flash

—

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 13.1. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 scores MATH-500: 96.6%, MT-Bench: 91.7%, MBPP: 91.3%, Arena Hard: 88.3%, BFCL v2: 73.7%.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 13.1), licensing (Unknown vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons