The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 8.9.

InclusionAI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 8.9, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
8.9
#290
Reasoning
47.5
#26
9.1
#283
Coding
38.8
#18
1.3
#246
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 5 for Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

115.0B diff

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) has 115.0B more parameters than Ling 3.1 Flash, making it 20.5% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
675.0Bparameters
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash
675.0B
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) was released on 2025-12-04.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 10 months newer than Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4).

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

10mo newer
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)

Dec 4, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4).

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 8.9. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) scores MMMLU: 85.5%, AMC_2022_23: 52.0%, GPQA: 43.9%, LiveCodeBench: 34.4%, SimpleQA: 23.8%.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 8.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4)?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Mistral Large 3 (675B Instruct 2512 NVFP4) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons