The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nova 2 Omni

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 25.8.

InclusionAI · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 25.8, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nova 2 Omni wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nova 2 Omni

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Nova 2 Omni
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.1
#14
25.8
#167
Reasoning
47.7
#25
28.1
#144
Agents
38.3
#11
4.5
#164
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ling 3.1 Flash
Nova 2 Omni
Tool use
29.0#13
14.9#101
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 18 for Nova 2 Omni

1 shared

Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova 2 Omni is better at 1 benchmark (Multi-Challenge).

Nova 2 Omni significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nova 2 Omni supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Nova 2 Omni can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova 2 Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Nova 2 Omni was released on 2025-12-02.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 10 months newer than Nova 2 Omni.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

10mo newer
Nova 2 Omni

Dec 2, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova 2 Omni side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Nova 2 Omni
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nova 2 Omni.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Nova 2 Omni?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 25.8. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Nova 2 Omni is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Nova 2 Omni in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Nova 2 Omni scores AIME 2025: 92.1%, RefCOCOg: 86.3%, ScreenSpot: 85.4%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%, Tau2 Telecom: 80.0%.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova 2 Omni?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.1 vs 25.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova 2 Omni?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Nova 2 Omni is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons