The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nova Micro

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 2.4.

InclusionAI · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 2.4, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nova Micro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Nova Micro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
2.4
#330
Reasoning
47.5
#26
1.7
#325
Coding
38.8
#18
2.6
#237
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.03 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 17 for Nova Micro

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Microdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Micro specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Nova Micro specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Micro
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 23 months newer than Nova Micro.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer
Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Micro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Nova Micro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nova Micro.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Nova Micro?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 2.4. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Nova Micro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Nova Micro in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Micro?

Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Micro supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Micro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 2.4), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Micro?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Nova Micro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons