The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nova Pro

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 12.2.

InclusionAI · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 12.2, ranking #14 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.1 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nova Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Nova Pro
Amazon
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.1
#14
12.2
#267
Reasoning
47.7
#25
12.0
#262
Coding
39.2
#17
10.1
#178
Agents
38.3
#11
10.2
#130
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
—
300,000

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 27 for Nova Pro

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Nova Pro specifies input context (300,000 tokens). Only Nova Pro specifies output context (300,000 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 23 months newer than Nova Pro.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Nova Pro?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.1 to 12.2. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Pro?

Ling 3.1 Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.1 vs 12.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Unknown vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Nova Pro?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons