Ling 3.1 Flash vs o1-pro
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 19.7.
InclusionAI · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 19.7, ranking #15 overall.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose o1-pro
- you are already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 2 for o1-pro
Ling 3.1 Flash and o1-prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
o1-pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.
o1-pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ling 3.1 Flash
o1-pro
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.
Ling 3.1 Flash is 22 months newer than o1-pro.
Sep 30, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.8yr newerDec 17, 2024
1.8 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.1 Flash's cutoff date.
—
Sep 2023
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and o1-pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs o1-pro.