The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 1.9.

InclusionAI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 1.9, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
1.9
#334
Reasoning
47.5
#26
1.4
#327
Coding
38.8
#18
-3.9
#269
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 31 for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.1 Flash and Phi-3.5-MoE-instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

500.0B diff

Ling 3.1 Flash has 500.0B more parameters than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct, making it 833.3% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 26 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.1yr newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.1 Flash
✓ Preferred
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Which is better, Ling 3.1 Flash or Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 1.9. Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.1 Flash compare to Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct in benchmarks?

Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.1 Flash and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 1.9), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.1 Flash and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct?

Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft.

Related comparisons