Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 18.2.
InclusionAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 18.2, ranking #15 overall.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Ling 3.1 Flash · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Ling 3.1 Flash has 529.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, making it 1706.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.1 Flash does not.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Ling 3.1 Flash
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Ling 3.1 Flash is 12 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.
Sep 30, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.0yr newerSep 22, 2025
1.0 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.