Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 14.7. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is 9.0x cheaper per token.
Meta · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 14.7, ranking #29 overall.
On price, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is roughly 9.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Wonder also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 9.0x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Muse Wonder
- overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct · 16 for Muse Wonder
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ($0.89/1M tokens) is 4.5x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($4.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct ($0.89/1M tokens) is 22.5x cheaper than Muse Wonder ($20.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Wonder is more expensive than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Wonder accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Only Llama 3.1 405B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Muse Wonder supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not.
Muse Wonder can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Muse Wonder
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.1 Community License
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.
Muse Wonder is 27 months newer than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.
Jul 23, 2024
2.2 years ago
Oct 12, 2026
0 days ago
2.2yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Fireworks, Bedrock, Together, Hyperbolic, Google, Replicate. Muse Wonder is available from Meta Model API.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Muse Wonder
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Muse Wonder.