The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -2.6.

Meta · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -2.6, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-2.6
#355
52.1
#13
Reasoning
-3.6
#353
38.4
#71
Coding
-2.3
#264
41.5
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.03 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

No common benchmarks found

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Wonder Fulldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder Full supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not.

Muse Wonder Full can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Muse Wonder Full uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder Full is 27 months newer than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.2 years ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

0 days ago

2.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder Full's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Dec 2023

Muse Wonder Full

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to -2.6. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is made by Meta and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 8B Instruct compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores GSM-8K (CoT): 84.5%, ARC-C: 83.4%, API-Bank: 82.6%, IFEval: 80.4%, BFCL: 76.1%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Wonder Full?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Muse Wonder Full supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.6 vs 52.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons