Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -2.4. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 7.7x cheaper per token.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -2.4, ranking #16 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is roughly 7.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.8 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

cost matters — it's about 7.7x cheaper per token
you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

overall performance matters — it scores 49.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared

Index

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Qwen3.8 Flash

Math

-2.1#300 · 6 evals

32.6#55 · 2 evals

Tool use

17.0#73 · 4 evals

31.6#10 · 2 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

1 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct ($0.03/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct ($0.03/1M tokens) is 15.7x cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.47/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.8 Flash is more expensive than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Input tokens$0.03

Output tokens$0.03

Best providerLambda

Qwen3.8 Flash

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$0.47

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

117.0B diff

Qwen3.8 Flash has 117.0B more parameters than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, making it 1462.5% larger.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

8.0Bparameters

Qwen3.8 Flash

125.0Bparameters

8.0B

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

125.0B

Qwen3.8 Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.8 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not.

Qwen3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen3.8 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8 Flash is 25 months newer than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

5 days ago

2.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Qwen3.8 Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.8 Flash's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Dec 2023

Qwen3.8 Flash

—

Provider Availability

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Groq, Sambanova, Cerebras, Hyperbolic, Together, Fireworks, Bedrock. Qwen3.8 Flash is available from Novita.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.03/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.05/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.05/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.08/1M

Sambanova

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

Cerebras

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Hyperbolic

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.22/1M

Qwen3.8 Flash

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.47/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

✓ Preferred

Qwen3.8 Flash

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.6 to -2.4. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is made by Meta and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 8B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores GSM-8K (CoT): 84.5%, ARC-C: 83.4%, API-Bank: 82.6%, IFEval: 80.4%, BFCL: 76.1%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.03/M input and $0.03/M output via lambda. Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.47/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.4 vs 49.6), context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.03 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is developed by Meta and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Which is better?

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

At a glance

Capability indexes

Individual benchmarks

Human preference

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

Input capabilities

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Qwen3.8 Flash

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Provider Availability

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Qwen3.8 Flash

Outputs Comparison

Judge for yourself.

FAQ

Which is better, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3.8 Flash?

How does Llama 3.1 8B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Who makes Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

More Llama 3.1 8B Instruct comparisons

More Qwen3.8 Flash comparisons

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Which is better?

Choose Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

At a glance

Capability indexes

Individual benchmarks

Human preference

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

Input capabilities

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Qwen3.8 Flash

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Provider Availability

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Qwen3.8 Flash

Outputs Comparison

Judge for yourself.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Qwen3.8 Flash?

How does Llama 3.1 8B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Who makes Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Related comparisons

More Llama 3.1 8B Instruct comparisons

More Qwen3.8 Flash comparisons