The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched at 0.4 and 3.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 0.4 and 3.8.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
0.4
#324
3.8
#306
0.1
#317
3.3
#301
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
7.0#266
10.6#250
6.2#163
5.0#172
6.2#148
5.7#154
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct · 16 for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

4 shared

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct outperforms in 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, MMLU, TruthfulQA), while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GSM8k).

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

55.3B diff

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has 55.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct, making it 376.2% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
70.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 0 month newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

1w newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 14B Instruct's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 0.4 and 3.8. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5 14B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (0.4 vs 3.8), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.