The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 12.1 to 4.8.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 12.1 to 4.8, ranking #257 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 12.1 and ranks #257 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
4.8
#304
12.1
#257
5.3
#299
12.2
#249
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.35 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
8.8#258
17.8#192
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 · 14 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

4 shared

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (IFEval, MBPP, MT-Bench).

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

64.7B diff

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 64.7B more parameters than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1, making it 808.8% larger.

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
8.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 was released on 2025-03-18, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Dec 2023

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 12.1 to 4.8. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 compare to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 scores MATH-500: 95.4%, MBPP: 84.6%, MT-Bench: 81.0%, IFEval: 79.3%, BFCL v2: 63.6%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (4.8 vs 12.1), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.