MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 12.1.
Xiaomi · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to 12.1, ranking #29 overall.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- you want predictable pricing at $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 14 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen2.5 72B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 236.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, making it 325.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Qwen
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 24 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
Sep 22, 2026
-1 days ago
2.0yr newerSep 19, 2024
2.0 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.