The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 19.1.

NVIDIA · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 19.1, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 47.9 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
19.1
#222
47.9
#29
Reasoning
18.8
#221
33.1
#108
Coding
12.3
#158
38.9
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$4.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$20.00 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Wonder specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not.

Muse Wonder can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is licensed under Llama 3.1 Community License, while Muse Wonder uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 was released on 2025-04-07, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 18 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Apr 7, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Dec 2023

Muse Wonder

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 47.9 to 19.1. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is made by NVIDIA and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores MATH-500: 97.0%, IFEval: 89.5%, GPQA: 76.0%, BFCL v2: 74.1%, AIME 2025: 72.5%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Muse Wonder?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens and Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.1 vs 47.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.1 Community License vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 and Muse Wonder?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is developed by NVIDIA and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons