The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 50.5 to -5.5.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.5 to -5.5, ranking #14 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.01/M input and $0.02/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.5 and ranks #14 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-5.5
#338
50.5
#14
-6.1
#332
50.6
#12
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.01 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.02 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
-3.2#297
33.3#50
4.7#143
32.3#8
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

1 shared

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

121.8B diff

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 121.8B more parameters than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, making it 3794.1% larger.

Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
3.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
3.2B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.2 3B Instruct does not.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 Community License

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 23 months newer than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.9 years ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

3 days ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads the LLM Stats Score 50.5 to -5.5. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is made by Meta and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 3.2 3B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct scores NIH/Multi-needle: 84.7%, ARC-C: 78.6%, GSM8k: 77.7%, IFEval: 77.4%, HellaSwag: 69.8%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.5 vs 50.5), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Llama 3.2 Community License vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is developed by Meta and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.