Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking are closely matched at 14.9 and 18.4 on the LLM Stats Score. Llama 4 Maverick is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 14.9 and 18.4.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Llama 4 Maverick is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 4 Maverick also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick

cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

5 shared

Index

Llama 4 Maverick

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Math

20.6#147 · 5 evals

22.5#128 · 11 evals

Vision

13.2#91 · 5 evals

13.0#94 · 30 evals

Multimodal

16.5#77 · 5 evals

15.8#80 · 24 evals

Finance

19.1#84 · 2 evals

23.9#62 · 6 evals

Legal

19.1#71 · 2 evals

24.0#51 · 5 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Llama 4 Maverick · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

4 shared

Llama 4 Maverick outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMMU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

For input processing, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens) is 1.2x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.99/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Llama 4 Maverick

Input tokens$0.17

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerDeepinfra

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Input tokens$0.20

Output tokens$0.99

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

369.0B diff

Llama 4 Maverick has 369.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, making it 1190.3% larger.

Llama 4 Maverick

400.0Bparameters

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

31.0Bparameters

400.0B

Llama 4 Maverick

31.0B

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Maverick accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Llama 4 Maverick

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output1,000,000 tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Input131,072 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 4 Maverick

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Maverick is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 6 months newer than Llama 4 Maverick.

Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Llama 4 Maverick

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M

Sambanova

Input Price:Input: $0.63/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.79/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Maverick

✓ Preferred

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 14.9 and 18.4. Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 4 Maverick compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Llama 4 Maverick is 1.2x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.20/M input and $0.99/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.9 vs 18.4), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.17 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Which is better?

Choose Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

At a glance

Capability indexes

Individual benchmarks

Human preference

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

Input capabilities

Llama 4 Maverick

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Maverick

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Judge for yourself.

FAQ

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

How does Llama 4 Maverick compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Who makes Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

More Llama 4 Maverick comparisons

More Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparisons

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Which is better?

Choose Llama 4 Maverick

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

At a glance

Capability indexes

Individual benchmarks

Human preference

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

Input capabilities

Llama 4 Maverick

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Maverick

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Judge for yourself.

Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

How does Llama 4 Maverick compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Who makes Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Related comparisons

More Llama 4 Maverick comparisons

More Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparisons