The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 4 Scout vs Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) are closely matched at 7.8 and 3.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Meta · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 7.8 and 3.6.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama 4 Scout wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.8
#283
3.6
#308
6.6
#286
3.5
#300
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.08 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
10,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Llama 4 Scout
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
12.8#232
8.8#256
10.2#128
7.6#141
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 6 for Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

1 shared

Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Llama 4 Scout significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

95.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 95.0B more parameters than Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512), making it 678.6% larger.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
14.0Bparameters
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout
14.0B
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) is 8 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

9 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Scout
✓ Preferred
Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512).

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 7.8 and 3.6. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) scores MMLU-Redux: 82.0%, MMLU: 79.4%, TriviaQA: 74.9%, Multilingual MMLU: 74.2%, MATH (CoT): 67.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.8 vs 3.6), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512)?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta and Ministral 3 (14B Base 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.