The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 16.4 to 7.8. Llama 4 Scout is 1.9x cheaper per token.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.4 to 7.8, ranking #226 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.4 and ranks #226 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.8
#286
16.4
#226
6.6
#289
15.0
#229
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.08 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
10,000,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

5 shared
Index
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
12.8#232
16.5#202
9.8#126
11.3#111
13.0#104
13.8#97
10.2#144
18.1#101
10.2#128
18.3#82
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

3 shared

Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens) is 1.9x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

78.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 78.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, making it 251.6% larger.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is limited to 262,144 tokens.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 6 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Scout
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 16.4 to 7.8. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.8 vs 16.4), context window (10.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.08 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.