The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Llama 4 Scout

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.8.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.8, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
7.8
#283
Reasoning
50.5
#12
6.6
#286
Coding
36.2
#22
0.4
#240
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
—
10,000,000

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 12 for Llama 4 Scout

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Llama 4 Scoutdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

635.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 635.0B more parameters than Llama 4 Scout, making it 582.6% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Atria Dawn Preview is 17 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

4 days ago

1.4yr newer
Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Llama 4 Scout?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 7.8. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Llama 4 Scout?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 7.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Llama 4 Scout?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons