The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 23.4. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is 2.6x cheaper per token.

Meituan · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 23.4, ranking #22 overall.

On price, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is roughly 2.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

LongCat-2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LongCat-2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.7 and ranks #22 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

  • cost matters — it's about 2.6x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LongCat-2.5
Meituan
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
49.7
#22
23.4
#208
Reasoning
48.0
#23
23.2
#200
Coding
38.0
#29
4.0
#249
Agents
35.8
#24
9.6
#157
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$0.55 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
LongCat-2.5
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Math
37.1#38
23.7#138
Vision
32.4#29
8.7#162
Tool use
29.9#18
5.0#187
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for LongCat-2.5 · 25 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

No common benchmarks found

LongCat-2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 costs less

For input processing, LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 2.2x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.55/1M tokens).

In conclusion, LongCat-2.5 is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.55
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1365.0B diff

LongCat-2.5 has 1365.0B more parameters than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507, making it 580.9% larger.

Meituan
LongCat-2.5
1.6Tparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
235.0Bparameters
1600.0B
LongCat-2.5
235.0B
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

LongCat-2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while LongCat-2.5 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Wed Nov 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

LongCat-2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 does not.

LongCat-2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LongCat-2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 was released on 2025-07-22.

LongCat-2.5 is 16 months newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

LongCat-2.5

Nov 1, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.3yr newer
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Jul 22, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita.

LongCat-2.5

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.55/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-2.5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better, LongCat-2.5 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 23.4. LongCat-2.5 is made by Meituan and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LongCat-2.5 compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 in benchmarks?

LongCat-2.5 scores MathVision: 96.5%, BrowseComp: 91.9%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.4%, Video-MME: 85.2%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 scores ZebraLogic: 95.0%, MMLU-Redux: 93.1%, IFEval: 88.7%, MultiPL-E: 87.9%, Creative Writing v3: 87.5%.

Is LongCat-2.5 cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. LongCat-2.5 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 costs $0.09/M input and $0.55/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

LongCat-2.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.7 vs 23.4), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.09/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Unknown vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507?

LongCat-2.5 is developed by Meituan and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons