LongCat-2.5 vs Seed 2.0 Pro
LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 38.7. LongCat-2.5 is 2.1x cheaper per token.
Meituan · ByteDance · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.7 to 38.7, ranking #22 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, LongCat-2.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, LongCat-2.5 is roughly 2.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
LongCat-2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose LongCat-2.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 49.7 and ranks #22 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 2.1x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
Choose Seed 2.0 Pro
- you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
23 reported for LongCat-2.5 · 6 for Seed 2.0 Pro
LongCat-2.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while Seed 2.0 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.
LongCat-2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Seed 2.0 Pro ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Seed 2.0 Pro ($3.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Seed 2.0 Pro is more expensive than LongCat-2.5.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
LongCat-2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Seed 2.0 Pro's 256,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both LongCat-2.5 and Seed 2.0 Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
LongCat-2.5
Seed 2.0 Pro
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01, while Seed 2.0 Pro was released on 2026-02-14.
LongCat-2.5 is 9 months newer than Seed 2.0 Pro.
Nov 1, 2026
1 weeks ago
8mo newerFeb 14, 2026
8 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Seed 2.0 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-01-01, while LongCat-2.5's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Seed 2.0 Pro's training data extends to 2024-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-2.5's cutoff date.
—
Jan 2024
Provider Availability
LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan. Seed 2.0 Pro is available from DeepInfra.
LongCat-2.5
Seed 2.0 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against LongCat-2.5 and Seed 2.0 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about LongCat-2.5 vs Seed 2.0 Pro.