The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LongCat-Flash-Lite vs Magistral Medium

LongCat-Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium are closely matched at 18.6 and 13.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Meituan · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 18.6 and 13.1.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Magistral Medium wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LongCat-Flash-Lite

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose Magistral Medium

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
18.6
#226
13.1
#263
18.9
#220
13.3
#254
7.0
#200
3.4
#230
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Magistral Medium
17.2#202
11.4#248
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for LongCat-Flash-Lite · 6 for Magistral Medium

3 shared

LongCat-Flash-Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Magistral Medium is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, GPQA).

Magistral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

44.5B diff

LongCat-Flash-Lite has 44.5B more parameters than Magistral Medium, making it 185.4% larger.

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
68.5Bparameters
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
68.5B
LongCat-Flash-Lite
24.0B
Magistral Medium

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only LongCat-Flash-Lite specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only LongCat-Flash-Lite specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Input256,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Lite does not.

Magistral Medium can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LongCat-Flash-Lite is licensed under MIT, while Magistral Medium uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LongCat-Flash-Lite

MIT

Open weights

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-Flash-Lite was released on 2026-02-05, while Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10.

LongCat-Flash-Lite is 8 months newer than Magistral Medium.

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2026

8 months ago

8mo newer
Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while LongCat-Flash-Lite's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-Flash-Lite's cutoff date.

LongCat-Flash-Lite

—

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-Flash-Lite
✓ Preferred
Magistral Medium
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-Flash-Lite vs Magistral Medium.

Which is better, LongCat-Flash-Lite or Magistral Medium?

LongCat-Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 18.6 and 13.1. LongCat-Flash-Lite is made by Meituan and Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LongCat-Flash-Lite compare to Magistral Medium in benchmarks?

LongCat-Flash-Lite scores MATH-500: 96.8%, MMLU: 85.5%, CMMLU: 82.5%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, Tau2 Retail: 73.1%. Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium?

LongCat-Flash-Lite supports 256K tokens and Magistral Medium supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (18.6 vs 13.1), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-Flash-Lite and Magistral Medium?

LongCat-Flash-Lite is developed by Meituan and Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.