The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 35.2. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.0x cheaper per token.

Meituan · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 35.2, ranking #29 overall.

On price, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Meituan
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.2
#105
48.5
#29
Reasoning
35.3
#99
45.8
#34
Coding
18.7
#127
37.8
#23
Agents
9.4
#144
35.6
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
128,000
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Tool use
24.3#41
26.8#30
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 · 14 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiniMax M3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

For input processing, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is more expensive than MiniMax M3.1 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiniMax M3.1 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601's 128,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash can generate longer responses up to 524,288 tokens, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 does not.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is licensed under MIT, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 was released on 2026-01-14, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 9 months newer than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Jan 14, 2026

9 months ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is available from Meituan. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 35.2. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is made by Meituan and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 scores AIME 2025: 99.6%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Tau2 Retail: 88.6%, LiveCodeBench: 82.8%, GPQA: 80.5%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports 128K tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.2 vs 48.5), context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.15/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is developed by Meituan and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons