The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Magistral Medium vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Magistral Medium and Phi 4 Reasoning are closely matched at 13.1 and 12.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Mistral AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Magistral Medium and Phi 4 Reasoning are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 13.1 and 12.0.

The models split the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Magistral Medium

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.1
#263
12.0
#270
13.3
#254
12.6
#259
3.4
#230
6.3
#204
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 4
2 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Magistral Medium
Phi 4 Reasoning
11.4#248
13.6#232
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Magistral Medium · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning

4 shared

Magistral Medium outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveCodeBench).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

10.0B diff

Magistral Medium has 10.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 71.4% larger.

Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
24.0B
Magistral Medium
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

Magistral Medium can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Magistral Medium is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Magistral Medium is 1 month newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Phi 4 Reasoning has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.

Magistral Medium has more recent training data (up to 2025-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Phi 4 Reasoning (2025-03-01).

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

3 mo newer
Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Magistral Medium and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Magistral Medium
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Magistral Medium vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, Magistral Medium or Phi 4 Reasoning?

Magistral Medium and Phi 4 Reasoning are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 13.1 and 12.0. Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Magistral Medium compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the main differences between Magistral Medium and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs 12.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Magistral Medium and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.