Model Comparison

MAI-Code-1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5Which is better in 2026?

MiMo-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: MAI-Code-1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5 — which is better?

MAI-Code-1-Flash (by Microsoft) and MiMo-V2.5 (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

MAI-Code-1-Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.5 is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0). MiMo-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose MAI-Code-1-Flash if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

MAI-Code-1-Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.5 is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

MiMo-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

MiMo-V2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Code-1-Flash does not.

MiMo-V2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MAI-Code-1-Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MAI-Code-1-Flash was released on 2026-06-02, while MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22.

MAI-Code-1-Flash is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.5.

MAI-Code-1-Flash

Jun 2, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Microsoft

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Xiaomi
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (56.1% vs 51.2%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (65.8% vs 54.8%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MAI-Code-1-Flash and MiMo-V2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MAI-Code-1-Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5

FAQ

Common questions about MAI-Code-1-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5.

Which is better, MAI-Code-1-Flash or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MAI-Code-1-Flash is made by Microsoft and MiMo-V2.5 is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does MAI-Code-1-Flash compare to MiMo-V2.5 in benchmarks?

MAI-Code-1-Flash scores AIME 2026: 92.5%, GPQA: 84.6%, IFBench: 75.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 71.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 71.6%. MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%.

What are the context window sizes for MAI-Code-1-Flash and MiMo-V2.5?

MAI-Code-1-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MAI-Code-1-Flash and MiMo-V2.5?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MAI-Code-1-Flash and MiMo-V2.5?

MAI-Code-1-Flash is developed by Microsoft and MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons