The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 27.4 to 21.8.

Microsoft · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 27.4 to 21.8, ranking #162 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 27.4 and ranks #162 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Microsoft
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
27.4
#162
21.8
#203
Reasoning
27.3
#159
19.6
#216
Coding
18.3
#132
2.8
#244
Agents
10.3
#139
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000
—

Individual benchmarks

2 reported for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

2 shared

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

134.0B diff

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has 134.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 3350.0% larger.

Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
138.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
138.0B
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MAI-Code-1.1-Flash specifies input context (256,000 tokens).

Microsoft
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash was released on 2026-08-11, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 2 months newer than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

Aug 11, 2026

2 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 27.4 to 21.8. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is made by Microsoft and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MAI-Code-1.1-Flash compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash scores SWE-Bench Verified: 72.6%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 62.9%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports 256K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (27.4 vs 21.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is developed by Microsoft and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons