The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 32.8.

Microsoft · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 32.8, ranking #25 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MAI-Thinking-1

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.2 and ranks #25 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
32.8
#122
49.2
#25
33.6
#112
37.7
#81
19.4
#121
38.2
#21
12.9
#117
37.2
#17
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MAI-Thinking-1
Muse Wonder
10.7#136
19.1#75
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for MAI-Thinking-1 · 16 for Muse Wonder

1 shared

MAI-Thinking-1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Wonder is better at 1 benchmark (HealthBench Professional).

Muse Wonder significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Wonder supports multimodal inputs, whereas MAI-Thinking-1 does not.

Muse Wonder can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MAI-Thinking-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

MAI-Thinking-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MAI-Thinking-1 was released on 2026-06-02, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 4 months newer than MAI-Thinking-1.

MAI-Thinking-1

Jun 2, 2026

4 months ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MAI-Thinking-1 and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MAI-Thinking-1
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MAI-Thinking-1 vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to 32.8. MAI-Thinking-1 is made by Microsoft and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MAI-Thinking-1 compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

MAI-Thinking-1 scores LongFact: 98.0%, AIME 2025: 97.0%, AIME 2026: 94.5%, GraphWalks: 90.0%, AIR-Bench: 88.0%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the main differences between MAI-Thinking-1 and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (32.8 vs 49.2), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MAI-Thinking-1 and Muse Wonder?

MAI-Thinking-1 is developed by Microsoft and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.