The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Mercury 3 vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mercury 3 leads the LLM Stats Score 36.1 to 4.7.

Inception · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mercury 3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.1 to 4.7, ranking #98 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mercury 3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Mercury 3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 36.1 and ranks #98 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
36.1
#98
4.7
#324
34.8
#103
0.9
#338
21.5
#105
1.0
#260
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.35 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Mercury 3 · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

1 shared

Mercury 3 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Mercury 3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mercury 3 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Mercury 3 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Inception
Mercury 3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 3 does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Mercury 3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Mercury 3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Mercury 3

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Mercury 3 is 19 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Mercury 3

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mercury 3 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mercury 3
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Mercury 3 vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Mercury 3 or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Mercury 3 leads the LLM Stats Score 36.1 to 4.7. Mercury 3 is made by Inception and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Mercury 3 compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Mercury 3 scores GPQA: 89.2%, AA-LCR: 77.7%, IFBench: 76.8%, MRCR v2: 75.5%, DeepSearchQA: 71.3%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Mercury 3 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Mercury 3 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mercury 3 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.1 vs 4.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mercury 3 and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Mercury 3 is developed by Inception and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.