The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark Open vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 4.9.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 4.9, ranking #43 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.9
#43
4.9
#322
45.2
#39
1.1
#336
33.0
#42
1.0
#258
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Muse Spark Open
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
31.6#69
5.0#285
31.2#34
5.1#172
33.1#20
6.5#150
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Muse Spark Open · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

1 shared

Muse Spark Open outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

809.0B diff

Muse Spark Open has 809.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 11557.1% larger.

Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
816.0B
Muse Spark Open
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark Open specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark Open specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Spark Open and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark Open is licensed under Muse Model License, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Muse Spark Open is 19 months newer than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

1.6yr newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark Open and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark Open
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark Open vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Muse Spark Open or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 4.9. Muse Spark Open is made by Meta and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark Open compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark Open and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark Open and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.9 vs 4.9), licensing (Muse Model License vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark Open and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.