The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.3 to 30.7. MiMo-V2-Flash is 13.3x cheaper per token.

Xiaomi · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.3 to 30.7, ranking #6 overall.

On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 13.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2-Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 13.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 54.3 and ranks #6 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2-Flash
Xiaomi
Muse Spark 1.3
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
30.7
#117
54.3
#6
Reasoning
30.8
#113
51.8
#7
Coding
17.5
#118
41.8
#10
Agents
8.1
#134
40.1
#6
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
256,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
MiMo-V2-Flash
Muse Spark 1.3
Tool use
6.3#147
33.7#4
Long context
14.9#52
31.9#1
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for MiMo-V2-Flash · 11 for Muse Spark 1.3

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Spark 1.3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens) is 12.5x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens) is 14.2x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.3 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.3 can generate longer responses up to 943,718 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark 1.3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Muse Spark 1.3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Muse Spark 1.3 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16, while Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 9 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

9 months ago

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Muse Spark 1.3 is available from Meta Model API.

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Muse Spark 1.3

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2-Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3.

Which is better, MiMo-V2-Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.3 to 30.7. MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2-Flash compare to Muse Spark 1.3 in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%. Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

MiMo-V2-Flash is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi. Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Spark 1.3?

MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Spark 1.3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (30.7 vs 54.3), context window (256K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.10 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Spark 1.3?

MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons